Part 1:
1: At the top of a paper write down 2 reasons you feel students don’t communicate in class.
2. Have participants mingle (play some background music while this is happening. They need to get another idea from someone to add to their list as well as give an idea.
Discuss ideas as a class:
List ideas on board. Possible answers: ( can try to elicit these)
-tired
-fear of being wrong
-fear of making a mistake
-not interest in class or subject
-shy
-insufficient time to form ideas
- no motivation /reason to communicate (no task)
-unfamiliar with being allowed to talk in class (culture)
-not given opportunity to communicate (teacher asks yes/no questions or asks and answers the questions themselves or always communication is teacher to student and never very natural)/ no group or pair work)
3. As class choose top 5 reasons.
4. Write these reasons at top of flip chart (poster) paper
Part 2:
1. Divide into 5 groups.
2. Each group gets one of the poster papers with challenge on it.
3. Explain they will have 2 min to write down possible solutions to the problem on the paper.
3. After 2 minutes have groups rotate clockwise to the next paper. (DO NOT MOVE THE PAPERS)
4. They will now have 2 minutes to read the suggestions and add to them.
After 2 minutes have groups rotate clockwise to the next paper. (DO NOT MOVE THE PAPERS)
4. They will now have 2 minutes to read the suggestions and add to them.
5. Continue until groups have returned to their original challenge.
6. Groups read all answers and choose top 3 suggestions.
7. Groups present challenge and solutions.
Part Three : Mini Lecture
Criteria on making things communicative:
1. Fun activities reduce stress and may help students remember content (Helgesen and Kelly 2016). Fun activities may also increase students’ integrative (internally derived) motivation and include topics that they know and care about (Nation and Macalister 2010). 2. Meaningful activities give students a chance to be experts and solve problems. Here, sharing ideas is more important than listening for perfect grammar. Repeated meaningful interactions also promote fluency, as students speak with greater efficiency over time.
3. Interactive activities require students to use their L2 to complete a shared task. Related to Nation and Macalister’s (2010) language-focused strand, interaction may also lead to improved accuracy and explicit attention to language learning during each interaction.
4. Routine (frequent) activities help students better understand the directions for each task, which may lead to easier implementation and improved on-task behavior (Kagan and Kagan 2009). Furthermore, if students repeat a task later in a course, they may be able to take on a more demanding language focus because the task is already familiar (Nunan 2014). Finally, fun activities repeated periodically over time may deepen students’ memories of each activity.
Some more ideas to share:
https://www.edutopia.org/blog/getting-the-ESL-student-talking-marc-anderson#:~:text=Speak%20slowly%20and%20clearly%20so,modalities%20heightens%20understanding%20and%20learning.
If time discuss how FSW Bingo met criteria
|